The Supreme Court left in place Friday two Biden administration environmental regulations aimed at reducing industry ...
The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Friday to put on hold new federal air pollution rules from President Joe Biden's ...
States and industry groups had asked the Supreme Court to pause the EPA's rule that aims to curb emissions of methane from ...
The Supreme Court has left in place an environmental regulation aimed at reducing the oil and gas industry’s emissions of the ...
The justices, in a break from the way they have handled most such cases in the recent past, told the challengers to first ...
But the Supreme Court in 2015 ruled that the EPA improperly failed to consider the costs of regulating power plants' ...
The Supreme Court is refusing to hear several cases challenging the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority on two rules looking to reduce toxic emissions.
States and industry groups have asked the justices to halt EPA’s restrictions on planet-warming emissions from the oil and gas sector. The Supreme Court should reject requests to block EPA’s ...
It is unlikely, however, that significant changes in EPA’s administrative enforcement practices will occur until there is a definitive Supreme Court ruling that extends Jarkesy to EPA enforcement.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2023 term is another chapter in the Roberts Court’s trend of shifting power away from administrative agencies and into the hands of courts. In Ohio v. EPA, the Court ...
Numerous other states and industry groups have challenged the EPA's disapproval in eight circuit courts. The 11th Circuit stayed the disapproval as to Alabama pending its judicial review. In June, the ...